Category: Matrimonial Law

A collection of Judgements which are related to Matrimonial Law by Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court.

Understanding Cruelty as Grounds for Divorce: Legal Insights and Case Examples

What is included in cruelty under Divorce Laws Repetitive abuse or inhumane treatment constitutes cruelty or domestic violence. It can cause emotional harm through repeated intimidation, violent language, verbal abuse, or threats of harm. Cruelty refers to violent acts. However, a mere quarrel, petty outrageous behaviour or differences between the spouses do not come in the ambit of cruelty because...

Divorce Settlement and its Enforceability

DIVORCE can be a deeply challenging and emotionally charged process. Understanding how to negotiate a fair divorce settlement, both inside and outside the court, is crucial for ensuring a just outcome for all involved. This article explores the mechanisms and considerations of divorce settlements, bolstered by recent judicial rulings and practical advice. The grounds for divorce under Section 13 of...

FAQ on Live In Relationship

What is meant by live-in-relationship? Live in relationship is when a couple, usually a man and a woman cohabit/ live together in a long term relationship as a husband and wife without being legally married. Are there any legal provisions granting rights to women in live-in-relationship? There is no specific legal provision regarding live in relationships however, Protection of Women...

Adultery no longer Criminal Offence in India – Section – 497 of Indian Penal Code declared Unconstitutional

In a landmark judgement of Joseph Shine vs Union of India on 27 September, 2018 Hon’ble Apex Court declared Section 497 of Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional. Section 497 is struck down as unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. Along with Section497, Section 198(2) of the Cr.P.C. which contains the procedure for prosecution under...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – SIX MONTH COOLING PERIOD IN A DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT CAN BE WAIVED BY THE FAMILY COURT

In the matter of Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur the question which arose for consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in this appeal was whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for filing of second motion for passing of Decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent...

Directions on Cruelty – Dowry Demand and Misuse Of Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code

Main contention raised in this appeal is that there is need to check the tendency to rope in all family members to settle a matrimonial dispute. Omnibus allegations against all relatives of the husband cannot be taken at face value when in normal course it may only be the husband or at best his parents who may be accused of...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – THE STATEMENTS AND ACTS WHICH CONSTITUTES AN ACT OF CRUELTY FOR SUSTAINING THE CLAIM FOR DIVORCE

Supreme Court of India Date of Judgement: 06.10.2016 FACTS OF THE CASE:- The reason for filing the divorce petition was that the wife had become cruel because of her highly suspicious nature and she used to level absolutely frivolous but serious allegations against Husband regarding his character and more particularly about his extra-marital relationship. Behaviour of the wife made life...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – GRANT OF A DECREE OF DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT BY WAIVING THE SIX MONTH STATUTORY PERIOD OF WAITING

Supreme Court of India Date of Judgement: 04.08.2016 Grant of a decree of divorce by mutual consent by waiving the six month statutory period of waiting. Facts of the case :- Parties living separately for more than five years-Husband want to go USA and wife also has to think about her future-Decree of divorce granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court...

BOMBAY HIGH COURT- WHILE GRANTING ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO A MAN THE HON’BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT OBSERVED THAT IF A MAJOR AND EDUCATED WOMAN GETS INTO PHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE AND UNDERSTANDS ITS CONSEQUENCES, THEN IT WOULD NOT FALL UNDER THE AMBIT OF RAPE

Bombay High Court Date of Judgement: 10.03.2016 In the present case, a 25 years old man was accused of rape, cheating and criminal intimidation by his former 24 years old partner. In the complaint, she alleged that the accused had got her into a physical relationship on the pretext of marriage and later refused to marry her. Click Here To...